The
Submission of Whom?
Amy
Waldman places her debut novel in the ash-filled wake of the
terrorist attacks of September 11th,
2001. The towers have fallen, and a small jury has been tasked with
choosing, from thousands of anonymous submissions, a memorial to
honor the lives lost. Among the jury members is Claire Burwell, the
only juror to have lost a family member, her husband, in the attack.
After
much deliberation the winning design is a garden, symbolic of healing
and rebirth, but the decision becomes controversial after it is made
public that the designer, an American named Mohammed Kahn, is labeled
a Muslim by a nosy reporter. Although he does not practice, and in
his own words an Atheist, many of his countrymen are insulted that he
would defile sacred ground with what they see as an “Islamic
Garden.”
Waldman,
a contributor for both “The New York Times” and “The Atlantic,”
has a powerful, punchy, prose that seamlessly incorporates symbolism
from the real-world events of 9/11 into the lives of her characters.
Her imaginary garden, with steel trees reformed from the wreckage of
the Twin Towers becomes an afterthought to it's imaginary designer,
the media, as well as the public.
The
process of building the memorial becomes a microcosm of American
democracy. A thousand different interest groups fight with one
another and among themselves until the whole process is compromised
to the point that an innocent women loses her life. The masses, eager
to use their collective voice, finds that it has none, and that
America is not a black and white country.
That's
democracy, finding a single resolution among three-hundred million
different opinions, and Waldman perhaps hints at the answer in the
title. There isn't a protagonist, or an antagonist either, but rather
just Americans, each trying to do what they think is right. The rub
is that while everyone wants to memorialize the attack, nobody can
agree on how to do it.
Waldman incorporates an intricate use of architecture and design into her prose, eloquently
describing the contours and lines of buildings. It fits the story of
the memorial thematically as well as engaging the reader with vivid
imagery. The memorial is brought to life by her words, and the reader
can develop their own opinion on it. At least until the epilogue, set
some time in the future, in which everything is neatly tied up, in an
underwhelming and seemingly forced conclusion.
People
say that everything changed after 9/11, and they are right, to an
extent. Waldman's novel is a portrait of the changing American
landscape in the twenty-first century, in which globalization and
capitalism has blurred the line between 'us' and 'them'. Despite a
dissatisfying ending, Waldman's writing is strong enough to carry a
reader through the 300 plus pages. As a work of fiction, “The
Submission” is as much a memorial to 9/11 as Waldman's imaginary
garden would have been.
I like how you connected the process of building the memorial to American democracy. That gives it another political element beyond the clear 9/11 aspects on the surface.
ReplyDeleteI also agree that the epilogue was unsatisfying. I think she should have just ended it and left things ambiguous.